Immediately you twisted it into suspicions not just about the event or the company, but that I registered today and posted here. Read my first post. If that was not an attempt to be helpful, I don't what is. That you then try to derive implications about me and actually challenge me so quickly is more suspicious than anything I could have written (excuse me fella, who are you but another board poster yourself). Me saying I'm not a company rep and you should contact them is somehow telling to you? Hmmmm. YOU POSTED THE ARTICLE. I replied. Perhaps I should take your approach and imply your motives for posting that article, hmmmm? Yeah, you get the drift. I deal with pros and cons of companies all the time and I do post elsewhere, so I'm no more fictive than you are. I do not like your attempt to turn my attempt to help you against me. It reeks of motive far more than anything I wrote in the first place. I said do your own homework if you're so hard up "verification" and I meant it. That was not a brush off, but an affirmation of your need for the truth. Why challenge me? Your intellectual premise is to undermine anything I wrote anyway, so if I gave "verification" it would still be explicitly "unverifiable" according to your logic. I read your other lengthy post on another board about conspiracy theory and how it is best not to believe anything a company says first. I see. I'm extraordinarily familiar with the rhetorical tactics used on message boards by silver tongued writers used to sway less sophisticated people and if you are going to try and undermine me, an authentic investor in XCHC, so quickly I POSIT THAT YOU ARE THE ONE WHO IS SUSPECT IN POSTING HERE. I said I know people who have spent plenty of time with the company, but I can say anything I want. So knock off the nonsense and find out yourself then if it means that much to you. I'm in no way selling my shares in this company and I'M QUITE CERTAIN THAT ARTICLE WAS A FALSIFIED PLANT and orchestrated as part of A SHORT ATTACK against this stock WHICH ISN'T WORKING. Based upon your unnecessarily challenging post to me, I'd say that you may be one of those shorts because you posted the "article" just as readily as I would be a pumper because I replied. I think this stock is going to be one of the monster oil stock runs of 2005-2006 and that the shorters are about to fry in hell.
Emma
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
