InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bababeely

03/01/11 4:31 PM

#36217 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

Thank you for venting. I feel the same way, brother.
icon url

nobody3

03/01/11 4:51 PM

#36220 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

i agree 100 %
icon url

gold56

03/01/11 4:58 PM

#36222 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

same here!!..they should give some sort of an update
icon url

therat

03/01/11 6:36 PM

#36229 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

I have a very little bit in another junior that released news today that they have started a 43-101 and the volume was only 700,000 with the pps only up 20% at .01. My point is that interest in miners has to be peaked along with news. People probably think gold won't sustain this new level or they want to see if it can. I think the 13's are gone. Too much tension and instability in the world right now.

People are gonna come back when they realize the gains that can be made in junior miners.
icon url

rmarc

03/01/11 8:11 PM

#36238 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

fox, where did you see the 43-101 compliant proved & probable gold reserves posted?
icon url

Bang Bang

03/01/11 11:52 PM

#36245 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

Well said. I just took a week away from this forum and PCFG in general (other than checking the PPS at the end of each trading day) to clear my head, and it seemed to work well.
icon url

Think or Swim

03/02/11 6:30 AM

#36263 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

Foxwoods. I think at this point it is very apparent that going into production with the shaker tables was not cost effective as they can not recover enough gold efficiently. The PR from the last production run in 2007/08 bears that out. Would you go into production with equipment that was only recovering less then 50% of the recoverable resource?

I think the reason they have been silent is a last ditch effort to see what amount of gold they can recover with the concentrator. What if the 43-101 report actually shows less reserves then estimated. Would you release it? And if it did show less reserves then they better damn well be able to recover upward of 90% of it.

Now anyone that thinks that this is going to hold .02 forever is crazy. It wont. The same as it did not hold .04, .035, .03, .025. With every passing day it begins to sound more and more like the same old PCFG story.

And PCFG releasing financials is not going to create any interest whatsoever. We know the financials are bad.

I'm afraid history is on the naysayers side at this point!
icon url

rocco2

03/26/11 12:05 AM

#38632 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

I would like to see a current picture of that trench jonny took a few months back, would answer a lot of questions
icon url

pro-trader

03/26/11 8:35 AM

#38635 RE: foxwoodsfan #36214

foxwood, if you are not doubting all those in your statement, than there is no need to get frustrated
especially when you are siting on free shares
what do you have to lose??? NOTHING
what do you ave to gain??? TONS
I believe the delay is lying within production itself and they are pulling gold out as we speak
the only reason not being announced is because with the money they are bringing the book up to date
just like we saw paying all debts and so on
in the mean time when those are paid, financial will follow
up list and production announcement
these is where they are getting the money from IMO
3 cents will be a joke for this company by summer time is what I believe
maybe much sooner than that
plus, don't even think about PCFG if you have nothing invested in it
think that you do not even have shares
think about it when we hit 25 cents and up and take your decision