When I look at your Chart with the + and - symbols I would be tempted to bet that it looks like an AIM system.
I thought that's what I've been saying! Yikes....
It might be interested if you could add the response of a Standard AIM starting out with the same real capital and then show the differences so that the benefit of LD-AIM can be shown graphically as well as numerically.
No can do since all of those + and - are real transactions for real $$$.
In addition, if you study the chart carefully, you will see that I made some mistakes too (hey, it's been known to happen from time to time)! Missed some obvious opportunities to Buy or Sell, but did not execute for whatever reason that can't be recalled.
What I can say is that the difference between initial capital outlay for Classic AIM would have been almost 3 times the one for LD-AIM (2.78 to be precise on this one).
Therefore the return on capital at risk must be higher LD versus Classic, everything else being equal.
And I daresay, everything else is equal....to AIM.
Remember, my original LD-AIM explanation from back in 2003 was that use of LD-AIM frees up capital for other programs allowing one to diversify more, thereby reducing risk.
No numbers necessary to relate to that.
The original comparative between LD and Classic is here:
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
