InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

bigoledog

03/01/11 1:05 PM

#31378 RE: rkiefhaber #31377

If it was available why didn't they use it on the last set of financials? Or did they and I some how missed it?
icon url

XenaLives

03/01/11 1:47 PM

#31380 RE: rkiefhaber #31377

I have been assured by IR that Carraway retained the operating loss. GRNO should have some from CCP though. If he can retain the loss that is also an indicator that there was a negotiation and that Carraway might also have retained other obligations, including SEC filing.

icon url

loanranger

03/01/11 3:07 PM

#31383 RE: rkiefhaber #31377

"The accumulated NOL should be over $10M."

I have no idea how you got there. Nor do I have any idea how the company got to an accumulated deficit of $1.2M+ as of year end 2009. But for the purposes of your post, neither matters. Taking advantage of a tax loss forward for a corporation does not require certified financial statements.
"Certifying the financials would be well worth the effort in my opinion."
For tax purposes, they need to have financials PREPARED. They don't need a PCAOB registered accountant for that.

But if Carraway retained the SEC filing obligations the whole thing begins to make sense.

Lord, I apologize for talking about SEC filing obligations like that, and be with the starving pygmies down there in New Guinea.