Whatever are you yammering about? What truth is being twisted? Read pgs. 6 & 7, beginning at line 17 on pg. 6. Even the Judge seems a little taken aback by the lack of documentary support for the claim. Do you want me to go through this whole thing with you line by line?
It does no good to try to obfuscate the issue. The specific issue is that Houser has only produced one single page document in support of his monetary claim.
The second issue is; the entire transcript should be a sticky note so that all can read it and have unfettered access to exactly what was said by whom. I assume you have no objection and I cannot imagine why you would. So "STICKY" it already!