InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ValuePro

02/25/11 8:58 PM

#50620 RE: Dreamchaser #50617


O.k. I'm just not one to take every event on the periphery of a company as having a direct bearing on that company.

I'll be happy to be proven wrong on this, of course, but for now there is nothing to suggest MC wanted to restructure their interests in Alaska.

VP
icon url

Milo2

02/25/11 9:39 PM

#50630 RE: Dreamchaser #50617

They would have seen our ZTEM data and know (as we do) their investment return would be vastly greater. And with the profit they make with us, can then buy the copper/moly coming out of the more advanced/producing NAK pebble!
icon url

Crystalballz

03/01/11 11:15 AM

#51066 RE: Dreamchaser #50617

I think they left NAK because they know something about the timing to get out, just like they knew about the timing to get in, simple. Highly doubt it has anything to do with LBSR's secret mineral claims next door.