Replies to post #39083 on One Step Ahead

[Bo14172]

Jim,

I have to head out, but just wanted to respond quick.

Your post is good, but your figures are based on 2032 shareholders and 6365 shareholders.

I thought it was established by the company itself that the 2032 shareholder figure wasn't an individual shareholder count, but a number which counted any given brokerage as (1) even though there were hundreds or thousands of investors under a certain brokerage.

With the confidence you and other like minded posters (obviously profiting from short selling CMKX) have that there is no naked short, then you should have no problem with CMKX counsel and CMKX shareholder counsel continuing their effort to count the shares. According to you we're not going to uncover a naked short problem anyway, so you should have no problem with the count expanding to include all (or most) of the shareholders.

Later all,

Bo