InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

smooth2o

04/12/05 10:01 PM

#54399 RE: dacaw #54398

dacaw: This is pathetic. If you don't understand even the basics of physical vs virtual I suggest you go invest somewhere else. Toys R Us perhaps?

You think that only the technical cognoscenti are allowed to invest in Intel? Do you think that maybe it would be hard to sell 6.5B shares that way? After all, even mutual funds would qualify. WBMW is FAR more knowldgeable than that...

I suppose, by your ANALysis, that if you don't have children, you shouldn't be investing in T-R-U?

Pathetic you say? Hmmm, get a health check-up.

Smooth
icon url

wbmw

04/13/05 2:42 AM

#54410 RE: dacaw #54398

Dacaw, your post isn't constructive, it isn't informative, and it doesn't even prove that you have any better understanding of Windows' physical and virtual memory addressing implementation than I do. It only indicates a certain level of resentment that evidently resulted from me questioning the necessity of 64-bits in blade servers. Ridiculous that this should set off such a harsh response. Consider therapy.
icon url

chipguy

04/13/05 9:11 AM

#54425 RE: dacaw #54398

This is pathetic.

If you don't understand even the basics of physical vs virtual I suggest you go invest somewhere else. Toys R Us perhaps?


This thread is about AMD, a semiconductor manufacturer.
Judging by the level of understanding of semiconductors
and the semiconductor business most of the regulars here
should invest elsewhere if one applied your criterion.