InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sanbrunobaby

02/18/11 12:47 PM

#7081 RE: packerfan9 #7080

With all due respect there is no "pink market" there is an Over the Counter Market. That market is governed by regulations that require information on the 15c211 to be available, and the 15c211 regulation requires financial statements.

And it is not unreasonable for a company that shows $4,000 revenue in a quarter to also book correctly $160,000 in salary expense.

However your general comments I feel are spot on. This is a sub-penny stock trading in a venue that is well known for being extremely speculative. Reviewing this company's press releases and filings, which you must admit are a bit confused to say the least, would make any investor come to conclusion this stock is very very speculative.

What perhaps causes the problem on this board is that the CEO actually tries to make disclosures but apparently neither he nor CFO are quite clear how to do so correctly, otherwise why would there be so much confusion in understanding company.

Anyway 1.5 million ounces in gold reserves, a "definitive merger" at $.04, and a new HIP HOP venture, are the keys to BTDG stock price. Surely it is not unreasonable for the company to clarify these things. Why do they avoid doing so ?
icon url

janice shell

02/20/11 11:21 PM

#7141 RE: packerfan9 #7080

San as I said to trade in pink markets no financial statement reporting required by Sec to trade.

You've said that countless times. Everyone here knows it. The point you evidently don't grasp is that if a company chooses to make public financial statements, they'd better be accurate.

That is not the case with BTDG.