InvestorsHub Logo

Cutting Corners

04/10/05 10:38 PM

#644 RE: coopdog #643

I agree 100% coopdog.

Bob

lowtrade

04/10/05 10:44 PM

#645 RE: coopdog #643

coopdog & all - Please; if you want to have a long critique of the info at my website e mail me. chuck_faulkner@hotmail.com

I should have known not to expect readers to take the time to check my profile for an email link. Sorry Tech & all.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Long responses to chuck_faulkner@hotmail.com please. Be happy to discuss our views by e mail.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sorry again Tech. If this gets to bad, please feel free to delete my post!

coopdog I'll e mail you soon , Thanks for your thought, lets talk! chuck_faulkner@hotmail.com




afxm

04/11/05 8:02 AM

#651 RE: coopdog #643

I agree coopdog, xmsr and siri are trading at their current levels based on their potential growth and earnings not current earnings which are negative.
Considering the electronic surveillance capabilities of the strat and the need to protect our borders. imo, the potential value of GTEL is greater than xmsr & sirius combined.

I disagree with a couple of points made by lowtrade in reference to a stocks value before and after a reverse split and to Huff's thinking.
---
by lowtrade:
"When R/S happen the value of the stock you own STAYS the same. $1,000 worth of stock is still worth $1,000."
"He know the mention of a R/S while on the OTC:BB could kill stock performance"
---
You can yell "stays the same" as loud as you would like to do so and it will not change the historical facts which show the opposit to be true.
The facts are that (999 times out of 1000) the value of your stock will be reduced just @ the mere hint of a reverse split. Regardless of what exchange your stock is trading, a R/S will almost always kill a stocks performance and there is plenty of historical evidence to back it up.
BTW Rocky... Great Discussion Board !