i am still working my way through this. he seems to be redifining a lot of terminology. main stream science dissapproves. he also claims to have a zero-point energy generator with no moving parts in development.
Space.com hash bashed that project from the start. If you read the follow up article, they raise the ? as to whether the project is any good at all. Some of these new writers don't know where Space.com has stood in the past.