InvestorsHub Logo

BigBake1

02/13/11 10:58 AM

#106987 RE: el_loco09 #106986

Ridiculous, as they would have to prove that BEHL was not being poorly managed and there were no criminal acts within it. That would go against their claim that BEHL was done wrong by sabotage from a former officer, or the other alleged charge of embezzlement of the previous CFO who they currently employed to do the 3rd and 4th quarter filings. Never mind the tax evader and delinquent decision maker who made deals before actually having money in hand the previous COB/CEO, who had no problem mismanaging millions of dollars during the PSC promotion scam. You cannot be held libel for making a statement that the amendment sitting at the SOS of Florida is another AS raise, as the trend was established. You cannot be held libel for predicting the epic crash of this stock as it went from 775 million to 4 billion shares in the matter of 9 months as it showed the careless management of money within BEHL.

Worst yet is drawing comparison to other companies who have yet to draw revenue, but are "fully reporting" to the SEC, that have well managed shares structure of only 117 million float and 180 million OS. Debt is fine if you are managing it and is to be expected of start ups as long as they are using their capital raising to finance growth in the business. But BEHL was none of that, it was about playing big shot and handing over money to act as if he was now "big time", instead of focusing on the company and his responsibilities to shareholders. Millions of dollars taken from the company during the PSC scam and handed over leaving very little money to operate and placing all the risk on common shareholders in the process.

No SEC lawyer in their right mind would touch such a case knowing what has just happened recently, with PSC going down and 6 specific companies identified as part of that SCAM, BEHL is in fact under scrutiny at this point. Evident by two of the six companies being halted and or investigated at this point, just a matter of time as the SEC has many complaints on file about BEHL and it's fraudulent activities. the SEC has made it clear in statements in many documents that the majority of pinksheet stocks are fraudulent activities, and cite such ridiculous forward statements that are often used, interestingly similar in BEHL. One such case is making up entities or awards, the current bio for the COB/President contains such references.