Replies to post #90169 on Expo Holdings Inc. (EXPH)

[patchman]

filling out a form correctly is hardly the same as lying about share ownership. If the filing says 10% are you saying it was a lie or filed incorrectly. if filed incorrectly can you explain how a simple calculation of ownership can be mishandled.

This is getting beyond *IMO* at this stage.

[Santa Barbara Broker]

Alright, you are claiming the EDGAR archived and clearly linked Expo SEC filing showing Kendrick as a 10% beneficial owner has either been fradulently filed, forged or altered when or since it was initially filed in January 2007? I seem to have misunderstood your original point, my apologies. I am wondering if anyone has reported this fraudulent document filing or alteration to the SEC or DOJ? Or to Expo Holdings, Inc. for that matter? I searched the archive and have failed to see a corrected document or amendment directly related to the one you are implying is fraudulent or illegally altered. IMHO.

SBB

[99leadballoons]

just an FYI 4kids.

November 14, 2007 was and always will be AFTER January 12 2007

It is disingenuous at best to try and refute an SEC document from January 12 2007 with a document that was signed off on 10 months later.

Guess what, he sold shares or the O/S increased so that he was no longer a 10% owner. Pretty simple.

[Jeremiah]

oh so those forms were filled out correctly then?

Why would a shareholder assume that this form contains wrong information on who was a beneficial owner in January 2007? JD signed the 504 on Jan 03, 2007 and it was filed on Jan 12, 2007.

It list four individuals as beneficial owners , three individuals as directors, and two executive officers.


http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/vprr/07/9999999997-07-002129

EDITED - added link, info