Replies to post #235818 on ERHC Energy Inc (ERHE)

[Krombacher]

That was uncalled for. In the iggy bin you go for a period of 10 days.

Krombacher

[Julius Erving]

I'm sorry Pepsiman, but you seem to be wrong:

From yesterday, from Dan:

It isn’t appropriate to selectively provide information to investors. Some expressed concerns to the Company about e-mail correspondence and the Company determined that such correspondence puts the Company at risk. Investors can still submit questions, and if they are answerable by the Company, we will do so through approved means, such as via the Company’s website or in a future investor update.

Sincerely,

Daniel Keeney, APR
DPK Public Relations

Somehow Dan's answer does comfort me, because it seems they do take caution when it comes to protecting the company and its rights, because they unneccesarily cut of most communication.

Now can you imagine any investor that would be happy with such a move from the company? Especially this company. I can't. But there seem to be people that do not want to get clarifications in general from this company.

It looks like some were positioning themselves, hoping to profit from investor-expectations around mid March.

These expectations were shattered by Keeney, rightfully so. There seems to be no reason to trade this stock around mid March due to some expected announcements. It looks like some are not happy with that message from Dan. And It also looks like I'm more sincere than Mark Govols...(?)

Again, I would stress for a ban for some posters operating here.