InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Julius Erving

02/10/11 5:36 PM

#235809 RE: snayeman #235803

Snayeman, don't bother.

You need some level of intelligence to understand if what you are saying is realistic, if you don't have that level, then all is in vain.

Of course Dan never asked me to post anything here, he can post himself, and he did a few times if I'm not mistaken.

I asked Dan a long time ago if I could post his information/clarifications on this board.

If I ever would have gotten inside information from Keeney (chance of being struck by lightning is higher I suppose) I would not have posted it here, that is for sure. Lol.

To EVEN SUGGEST that the 'information' Dan Keeney gave over time, is or has been worth trading on... you must have some seriously low IQ.

Most likely AMJ23, who routinely and continiously circles this board, is a paid person. Remember she said herself that this board does not serve any purpose, since all information comes from www.erhc.com

If it wasn't for the lousy worthless job she is doing, I would say, beware folks.

Can we get her to be banned from Ihub?

Maybe something for a poll?

Who wants AMJ23 in the eternal iggy?

Who wants more clarifications from Dan Keeney over the coming periods? Then we all can ask him a question in turn. And he can answer via his own handle.

Here is what Dan Keeney said himself today about our waste of time with this paid person AMJ:

When I describe the Company’s EXPECTATIONS, that is not speculation. It is the Company describing what it expects to occur. I suppose there may be a fine line to distinguish expectations from speculation, but expectations are based on all this is known by the Company. It isn’t just guessing about something.

Sincerely,

Daniel Keeney, APR
DPK Public Relations


Every moron would have understood this up front, except for paid people.

Again, some act like they are being paid.

A ban from the board would be in order imo.
icon url

amj23

02/11/11 9:54 AM

#235841 RE: snayeman #235803

actually, no I am not off, Julius posted yesterday that he posted what Dan told him to, in his own words. he may not have asked you, but apparently he did with one poster. also that original post was on a day when we were poised to go higher, we were trading at .235 on January 25th, the bid side was building and we closed down and continued to go down over the next several trading days. so is it helping or hurting to get this speculation, the chart says it all

if the company were in the right, they would have continued on, but they did not. being a little less than honest is still dishonest.