InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

PURA VIDA

02/08/11 10:36 AM

#48060 RE: Zenfolio #48058

Now ZEN, those are really great observations and incredibly good points. BRAVO

These questions should be answered, and they should be required to be answered.

Maybe we will get an update out of the company via your efforts.

I too am invested, and I am HEAVILY invested....for my means.

Let's see what your efforts yield - hopefully they will update the website - it is a probablility that it didn't even enter their thoughts before you JOGGED their memory - I hope.

S4
icon url

Dreamchaser

02/08/11 11:21 AM

#48063 RE: Zenfolio #48058

There has been some confusion, I agree. But the area that says dropped; that map is cartoonish at best. The maps by others look nice. Read all of the post here and study the maps that others posted
icon url

Milo2

02/08/11 5:14 PM

#48100 RE: Zenfolio #48058

Amen, Zenfolio...well put...and thanks for challenging Tracy on it!
icon url

HKipp1

02/08/11 6:49 PM

#48108 RE: Zenfolio #48058

I've been away today and so haven't been following the posts til now. But I'm pretty surprised at all the confusion. The parcel of land that was sold to ND is obvious and clearly depicted on the map I posted. It is labeled Liberty Star (Purchased Claims). It doesn't get much clearer. This has nothing to do with White Sox which is shown on the accompanying map as north of Pebble but a part of BCSP South. Also the ZTEM anomalies have not been located in either the Purchased Lands or White Sox. We don't know where they are. This confusion comes from targets that were placed on some maps, including the famous "bagel map" which are not ZTEM anomalies but older targets identified by older methods- IP and geochemical. The Puchased lands noted on the Map is the one and only approx. 23 square mile parcel sold to ND as per the JV agreement and announced by Liberty. This parcel on the map is the one in question as it comes from the official submission to the State for the CPQ process to get approval for the 5 shallow drill holes also depicted on the parcel. If that's not the Purchased Parcel then- oops- they drilled in the wrong place. Not likely. I'm not sure where the confusion has arisen. Maybe just too many maps. You might review the documents in the stickies under the consolidated DD for the letters and coordinates detailing all this. It makes it all really quite clear. There are many uncertainties. But doesn't happen to be one of them.