eliaman, I'm well aware of that undated, unfiled and unsigned piece of trash. And, correct me if I'm mistaken, but it appears that absolutely nothing has been done to provide any substance or veracity to it since it was posted almost 8 months ago.
Rather than start over, I'll just post my response to it at the time.....since neither my feelings nor the reliability of the document have changed since:
Wednesday, June 23, 2010 8:28:35 AM
hoggey1: "I don't have all the particulars, regarding outcome - any settlement, judgment or award, but the suit is curious in that it alleges Celia committed fraud and..."
me: Of course you don't.
The only reference that I found to this "suit" ANYWHERE is the document link*** that you provided: http://www.scribd.com/doc/33430634/Litigation-Complaint-122107 A Google search on the following terms produces only one(1) result.....your link: aquamatrix dicon celia "supreme court for manhattan county" If such a suit was filed in Supreme Court for Manhattan County, as shown, it managed to avoid being documented in Scroll (Supreme Court Records On-Line Library) and Web Civil Supreme. The so-called "Litigation Complaint" is undated without assignment of a case number and contains neither a signature page nor are there any supporting exhibits attached. The "filer" is no longer around so we can't get them to give us a status report. "Investors are advised that Pink OTC Markets has not been able to contact this issuer." http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/AQMT/company-info
You do a lovely job of hedging your bet: 1. Looks like Celia (was) sued for fraud. 2. "........the suit is curious in that it alleges Celia committed fraud....." 3. "It sounds like there are some questions as to Mr Celia's character and/or ethics...."
Still, your post is a peach of a character assassination. Provide some of the "particulars" that you "don't have" and watch how fast I apologize for casting doubt on your effort. I'll wait.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
