InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Dreamchaser

02/05/11 6:52 PM

#47785 RE: tokelley #47780

Here is the evidence. Mr. Briscoe has been using Pebble for a DNA fingerprint ever since he started. The ZTEM was therefore done on both Pebble and Big chunk as affirmed:


These anomalies are in the size range of the footprint of the nearby Pebble deposit(s), also within the Big Chunk caldera, and go to significant depth.

http://www.libertystaruranium.com/www/investors/news-releases/nr-88-liberty-star-appoints-larry-liang-as-director-and-vice-president


"When the Big Chunk Caldera Project was identified and acquired, one of the first Technical Advisory Board members and contractors was Geochemist S. Clark Smith. The very first thing that was done at the beginning of the first field season last year was an agreement with a neighboring landowner that Liberty Star Gold would take control (or orientation) geochemical samples over the neighbor's portion of Big Chunk caldera, to determine its' geochemical signature - somewhat like a finger print or DNA
of the mineralization. Liberty Star would provide the neighbor with our results on completion. This control test was done first. Then the remainder of the geochemical survey "net" over the Big Chunk project was done with samples spaced closely enough to reduce the risk that a porphyry mineral system could slip through. The results are now in. While much additional interpretation needs to be completed, the results so far are very meaningful and exciting."



http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_Jan_24/ai_n8706410/


icon url

Dreamchaser

02/05/11 6:57 PM

#47786 RE: tokelley #47780

I also want to add that everyone should study the ZZTEM reports with complete detail. All of your research is also in the DD here as well.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=59382007

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=58718655