InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sburlria

02/04/11 8:47 PM

#89433 RE: fourkids_9pets #89432

and what possible relevance could it have
whether you care if there is volume or not?
Based on total speculation about some form of transparency, which is completely unwarranted..
icon url

underdog150

02/04/11 9:29 PM

#89435 RE: fourkids_9pets #89432

I believe that was the exact period that JD and company changed their restricted shares to common shares if you back up a few months. Odd how the volume blew out in that time period, to the downside of course. No need to dilute when insiders are selling their newly unrestricted common shares. The obvious dilution began in March of 2010. Did the company ever come up with a reason why they gagged the TA in early 2010? LMAO
--------------------
so it's been posted numerous times
including the 6 months where there
was zero *dilution* in any way shape
or form .. :) (sept 2009 - mar 2010)
icon url

SevenTenEleven

02/04/11 9:46 PM

#89437 RE: fourkids_9pets #89432

EXPH - Daily short reports tell a story of dilution coming from the sale of short shares.

Until FINRA puts a new system in place, those that can game the system, will game the system.

No one claiming shorts aren't aren't short cannot seem to find a link of document authorized by FINRA supporting their claims.

Until then, let's use this to explain what the daily short volume report represents.

http://regsho.finra.org/DailyShortSaleVolumeFileLayout.pdf

Shorty makes billions of dollars collectively per year in the pinks. Has plenty of creative resources deployed to help him cover.

EXPH appears to be one of his favorite targets.