InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Traderfan

02/03/11 5:36 PM

#71313 RE: ratobranco #71311

CCME, I agree I just have a hard time to see them buying back shares for 100 million USD if they haven't bought any shares back a few months ago at 7.50. But we will see what they will show up. But if they respond to the public like they responded after the Citron piece you can very soon buy at 8 again. I hope Jacky gets this.
icon url

derek2000

02/03/11 5:37 PM

#71314 RE: ratobranco #71311

I agree w you on the buy back. I wish they declare to buy back all floating shares at $10 from those who are willing to sell.
icon url

swampdonkey

02/03/11 5:43 PM

#71315 RE: ratobranco #71311

completely agree
icon url

jepicza

02/03/11 5:47 PM

#71316 RE: ratobranco #71311

CCME - I disagree with you, too. :-)

They have to go through their papers again, make sure that all the numbers are correct, and then -- they should hire the best copywriter/lawyer they can and buy 1-page space in the WSJ and NYT.

While leaving 1/2 of the page pure white, the center will cover the story: about a start up company, non-American, on the U.S. exchange, about what they accomplish after 2-3 years, how many small investors invested with them, and then -- about mafia style orchestrated and timed attack to scam investors, while SEC and other authorities were just sitting around, doing nothing. And it should end with one great: "Thank you, that you really care about us and the small investors."

It will work wonders.
icon url

Michael Anderson

02/03/11 6:15 PM

#71324 RE: ratobranco #71311

CCME - They definitely need to reply to the allegations, but be careful because it could result in back and forth. Starr needs to come out too. They need to start a lawsuit as well. They obviously need to put that money to use. Basically, they need to show that they are a top tier firm and go above our expectations. They need to come out and re-iterate earnings and be definitive.