Replies to post #45089 on MediaG3 (MDGC)

[CharlesNet]

Isn't that the same type of argument that the tobacco companies used to articulate in the 1960's and 1970's?

Once the whistle blowers surfaced the entire landscape changed.

[Stock_Nerd]

MDGC: MediaG3 and Aerius...No Unilava?! LOL

GLTA!
Stock_Nerd

[GreaseWD40]

LOL! Can you please provide a link or links to back up your recent statements?

There appears to be a rising concern considering more and more people are constantly connected to their phones.
Think about how long it took to determine the dangers of cigarettes.
Now think about the time since cell phones where introduced to society.

Mobile phone radiation and health
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobile_phone_radiation_and_health



Aerius [MDGC Partner]


http://www.goaerius.com for more info...

Mobile phone radiation poses health risks: Government panel
http://www.sify.com/news/mobile-phone-radiation-poses-health-risks-government-panel-news-health-lcdtupcdbje.html
2011-02-03 19:20:00

Citizens ensure warnings on cell radiation are taken seriously in Mumbai
http://www.dnaindia.com/mumbai/report_citizens-ensure-warnings-on-cell-radiation-are-taken-seriously-in-mumbai_1500686
Jan 30, 2011

Limit Your Exposure to Cell Phone Radiation
http://www.ewg.org/cellphone-radiation

[sbb4th]

Hmmm.... this is one post I can HALFWAY agree with you. Yes, green is overhyped. I also believe this radiation exposure is overblown. However you miss or ignore a couple of salient points. First, perception is reality. Green is good and will be sucked up by the eco-freaks. And if you have a choice of a phone that emits low radiation to one that is relatively higher which would you choose? 2 - The real value is the better reception, fewer dropped calls and increased battery life. But I guess that's a bad thing too.

One post mode

[colemano]

Well then, that proves it. You must be right if the major manufacturers, for whom you apparently speak, all know from speaking with every state, federal, and appeals court (including future judges) and after reviewing all law in the U.S. whether it is statutory or jurisprudential, and having tested the possibility of cancer causing emmissions on all antennas for decades for any long term effects and having spoken to every expert whom could possible render an opinion on the subject that there is absolutely no "liability" for cell phone radiation. Wow, that is simply amazing and must be a fact if you say so.

I find it interesting that you couch your argument in terms of liability instead of effect or damage.

[K23]

I never agreed with what you post here day and night vilifying Val and his talented team of MediaG3. But on this one, I am with you. Yes, my fellow Longs may disagree and wonder what I am saying (but guys, please excuse me here for siding with our perennial friend). Eddy, do you have a scientific background by any chance? Because otherwise it is hard for others to comprehend the complexity of this issue.

There is no real scientific proof that electromagnetic radiation from cell phone use pose any adverse effects in humans. Yes, there are some anecdotal reports and their conclusions cannot withstand tough scientific scrutiny based on modern biological principles and statistics. There could be some subtle negligible adverse effects from radiation but we do not have right technology to measure those effects or offer convincing proof to rebut the perception that cell phone radiation is bad for your health. No matter how great we feel on our accomplishments, we still have a long way to prove every thing that occurs in nature. Case in point: Who thought in modern 21st century, the ability of dogs to smell and accurately detect breat cancer in her master? Canines detecting prostrate cancer by smelling the urine of the patients or licking the temple region of the head when the owner had tumor growing inside his/her head? They have all now been verified and proven correct based on MRI and biopsy.

But there is a strong belief or perception among some that radiation from cell phones is bad. So Val found a cell phone that emits significantly less radiation. We have a good product and perception sells. So I have no problem with that. If people are happy and feel safe why not market that product. Hope our Aerius cell phones hit the market soon and the PPS jump to $0.20- 0.50 before the onset of summer.