I never agreed with what you post here day and night vilifying Val and his talented team of MediaG3. But on this one, I am with you. Yes, my fellow Longs may disagree and wonder what I am saying (but guys, please excuse me here for siding with our perennial friend). Eddy, do you have a scientific background by any chance? Because otherwise it is hard for others to comprehend the complexity of this issue.
There is no real scientific proof that electromagnetic radiation from cell phone use pose any adverse effects in humans. Yes, there are some anecdotal reports and their conclusions cannot withstand tough scientific scrutiny based on modern biological principles and statistics. There could be some subtle negligible adverse effects from radiation but we do not have right technology to measure those effects or offer convincing proof to rebut the perception that cell phone radiation is bad for your health. No matter how great we feel on our accomplishments, we still have a long way to prove every thing that occurs in nature. Case in point: Who thought in modern 21st century, the ability of dogs to smell and accurately detect breat cancer in her master? Canines detecting prostrate cancer by smelling the urine of the patients or licking the temple region of the head when the owner had tumor growing inside his/her head? They have all now been verified and proven correct based on MRI and biopsy.
But there is a strong belief or perception among some that radiation from cell phones is bad. So Val found a cell phone that emits significantly less radiation. We have a good product and perception sells. So I have no problem with that. If people are happy and feel safe why not market that product. Hope our Aerius cell phones hit the market soon and the PPS jump to $0.20- 0.50 before the onset of summer.