Replies to post #129204 on KAT Exploration Inc (KATX)

[B402]

So they just let go of 1/3 of the original RR claims
and only have a 60 day extension on another third,,,,,
correct..Leaving only 1/3 of the original claims, for now, solid..

Wonder how the drill holes line up..

In all honesty the 102 extras mean nothing to me
It is, common practice
If RR hits
Then they are important

[Grahamber]

Great work guys. That is why this is still an awesome board for facts. Be they good or bad, we longs want them on the board to discuss. Great companies can handle the scrutiny...

[usafa]

Thank-you!

[B402]

So..

These are the Original RR Claims Before the 102

I see where the 30 claims listed under Tim Stead's name (license 016772M) are not showing up in his name any more:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=016772M

The 21 claims under Ken Stead (license 0159991M) are still there:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=015991M

The 32 claims under Kat Exploration (license 016773M) are still there:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=016773M

30 claims by Tim...Cancelled
32 claims under KAT.Only extended for 60 days

Thats 62 of 83 Cancelled or just extended
Thats most of RR

What was the HYPE based on then.....

[Biochemist2002]

Rusty Ridge/Shaylee Claims Data & Visual:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/resourceatlas/viewer.htm

Shaylee
License 017389M
Mineral Rights Inquiry Data:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=017389M

Rusty Ridge
License 018404M
License 016773M
License 015991M

Mineral Rights Inquiry Data:
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=018404M
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=016773M
http://gis.geosurv.gov.nl.ca/mrinquiry/license.asp?license=015991M