InvestorsHub Logo

fourkids_9pets

02/02/11 5:39 PM

#89296 RE: goldstandard #89292

:)

it may surprise some to learn that GTCs'
have been *targeted* for close to 2 mos now

and while it's *easy* to dismiss aspects

some may remember that

6M shares were scrounged around for .. found
and taken out of an acct just b4 the SM back
in sept (they were done on margin at .0018)

that set up the *bear raid* done from 0024 to 0012

*coincidentally* immediately following that exercise
EXPH had the 2nd (after the form d debacle on 6/2/10)
highest YTD (2010) *volume*

fast forward to 11/29/2010 .. the 3rd record YTD 2010
volume set on a 150M shares *anticipated* that weren't
delivered

until TA issued them on 12/8/2010

2 days later *volume* ensued again .. 4th record set YTD 2010

last one for 2010 (5th) .. was on 12/22/2010

and thru out it all as exph was shorted a tick lower (or 2)

efforts failed ~ which is why .. exph isn't no bid and why
every trade (except 10k) at the ask .. shows on daily reg sho
since 1/18/2011
:)

in december .. customers of X were contacted and told that
their GTCs' .. which had been set for months were being canceled
as they were set too far away from EXPH's pps .. how amusing and
of course just a coincidence i'm sure

==
gotta love a rigged game :)

==
4kids
all jmo

Santa Barbara Broker

02/02/11 6:26 PM

#89302 RE: goldstandard #89292

They wouldn't be. There is a story there that goes well beyond EXPH's role in it and I don't think it's worth pursuing any more than the secret agent NSS of EXPH's "closely held shares" are. High profile, legitimate brokerages don't treat shareholders of EXPH shares or anyone else's shares that way because they CAN'T treat them that way. There is a huge part of that story, much like EXPH's, MIA. IMHO.

SBB