InvestorsHub Logo

sx1100

01/30/11 9:17 AM

#32448 RE: foxwoodsfan #32447

I don't understand it either I thought "they" had a stake in PCFG, BTW foxwoodfan, IMO "they" should not be banned as long as they try to back up their assertions. I have real money on this and want to hear the good bad and the ugly. IMHO

Judging from "their" profile, this poster intends to do nothing but harm PCFG in an attempt to gain PCFG shares cheap, completely self defeating and il-logical. Ban away. again JMHO.

uwf2466

01/30/11 9:41 AM

#32449 RE: foxwoodsfan #32447

He's accomplished his goal from Post #30236 on January 12th.

Conflict causes discussions. Discussions cause posts. Posts cause top 15 on Ihub. Top 15 causes buys!

Is conflict on the board really going to get an interersted investor in, I doubt it. We all know this is in a holding pattern until more definitive production dates are given and/or uplisting is going to happen.

nobody3

01/30/11 11:06 AM

#32458 RE: foxwoodsfan #32447

if you want to see a scam stock check out unco. i belive they have started mining mass dulition due to many rs's and many law suits,and many more law suits to come

ScotiaNostra

01/30/11 11:19 AM

#32460 RE: foxwoodsfan #32447

Good post ... especially the last bit.