InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

borntwice

01/27/11 11:54 AM

#36474 RE: BuyOnDips #36473

Who handed the money over? Was it Alliance Aquisitions?

Some investors care about the validity of a product (I do) Others just care about making money.

Unless we know who those investors were (and it very well could be a group of IMGG friends - they did start a company just for this reason) then we really can't know whether it was a trade or an investment... On paper it sure does look right now like those investors made quite a bit of money in a very short period of time..

An investing group trying to make money quick is no reason to assume the device works.
icon url

adrian taylor

01/27/11 12:02 PM

#36476 RE: BuyOnDips #36473

The last investors didn't invest in the device....they invested in Dean Jane's mouth. They couldn't care less if the device worked or not.....I really believe they knew it didn't work. They felt that Janes would maintain the share price high enough to get out with a nice short term profit of $200K+.....and that is exactly what they did. In @.218 and immediately out @.24/.25. Janes performed brilliantly and kept the share price up long enough for the institutional investors to get out leaving the rest of us holding the bag@ .16
icon url

stockmasterflash

01/27/11 12:07 PM

#36479 RE: BuyOnDips #36473

Wharton Capital

doesn't have a great track record in picking winners.

http://searchwww.sec.gov/EDGARFSClient/jsp/EDGAR_MainAccess.jsp?search_text=%22wharton%20capital%22&isAdv=false

they backed SGNC Sanguine corp--(penny stock scam) a 1 man shop peddling a synthetic blood. the 1 man was about 80 years old too!
DOA

and ENMD Entremed who I followed almost a decade ago and still hasn't been able to bring their cancer drug to market-- had atleast 1 reverse split in the interim

I don't see ANY household names in their filings.