Mr. Rogers, for my benefit would you be kind enough to explain to me how in view of your most recent report how post #4082 in which comments are made by the poster about Greg like: "Who is he in relation to the trades of this stock?" or myself, "Why are you concerned with Joe. Who is he in relation to the future of WTCH? IMO nothing"; how is it that these comments are not viewed as impugning greg's or my credibility and thus the same as personal jabs, which Matt told me are not cool, and as you yourself said in reiterating Matt's position in your most recent post?
I would appreciate hearing your point of view on the questions I raise, and look forward to being further illuminated by your commentary in order to clear up my confusion.
Just trying to understand the rules of the road.
Thank you.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
