You realize that they did not report any Cu or Au from either hole #1 or #2 and only "sub-economic" from hole #1. So my question to you is: What makes you so sure that the deeper they go there will be more Au and Cu?
And why do you expect to see higher concentrations at depth for anything?
I am just interested in your reasoning.
My opinion is that ANYONE stating the results will be poor or great are just arm waving. There is no public information available that suggests either way. We know that that sampled a mineralized section in hole #1 with elevated REEs that extends to over 200m. This does not ensure good or bad results.
DISCLAIMER: I am an anonymous poster and all opinions and/or interpretations are mine and mine alone and meant to facilitate open and honest discussions. I have no affiliations with this or any other mining company. If this were to change I would make it known and restrict or stop posting on this board. Please don’t ask for my credentials. As such, it is your right to ignore or question anything I post. Nothing I post is meant as a recommendation to buy or sell this or any other stock. Thus, I will not post whether I buy or sell any stock.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
