Let's be fair. Unless you have carefully considered both sides and read through the whole court document,making an judgement based on a newspaper article is not fair.If CEO and BTDG have no money, were they able to present their side of the story ? Maybe you are right I don't know.
More important for shareholders is that there was a judgement against BTDG. Is that liability reflected on their balance sheet? Has anything been paid on it ?
So let us say the shares of the different businesses BTDG is acquiring have value. Can't Direct TV just execute the judgement and take those assets ?