Replies to post #84362 on Laidlaw Energy Group, Inc.(fka LLEG)

[Jobe Jackelpappy]

They have to factor in cleanup costs from past contamination of the site. Greenfield doesn't carry those costs.

Interesting observation. I've audited asset retirement obligations (ARO) and environmental remediation. Both are a pain in the neck and costly.

I hope, and I have to believe they will if true, that Laidlaw's management and the PSNH call out Concord / CPD on this point.

[now invest]

Just trying to point out.. while the fuel might be Apples to Apples... the entire deal is far from that... Just the Wattage difference means a less % gain in Renewables for the Utility AND the State to meet their objectives. AND.. to make up that % with a different fuel/location could far surpass the difference in costs if there really is any when all is said and done..

IMO... LLEG is good for NH and especially Berlin.

And frankly, I really like EVERY WATT EXTRA that is produced with our own Timber Vs. Foreign OIL!!!!

Forgetting about my investment here... I just can't beleive that they drag this on up there.. I will ALL of our gov't gets on the ball with this... and Natural gas.... US PRODUCTS!!

[spencerforhire]

Do you really think those costs are figured into this, King Oil?