InvestorsHub Logo

one4theroad

01/18/11 7:53 PM

#45804 RE: austin wells #45803

well I don't know, the must not have had a history like LBSR......Either way I was talking about the comparison to GOOG......Like I said, I'm all for it but IMO it will come at a greater expense to shareholders, again!

ValuePro

01/18/11 8:14 PM

#45808 RE: austin wells #45803

Poor analogy. How about when Aurelian was taken out by Kinross, who are still drilling Fruta del Norte in Peru?. Or, how about when Inco took out Diamond Fields in the largest take over of an explorer in the 1990's?

king yukon

01/19/11 10:04 AM

#45818 RE: austin wells #45803

austin: Here is what is far fetched. Replying without doing any DDing,PHEZ sez that I am only PUMPING PPs to get us way up there. First I asked everybody do the DDing on B.C. CANADA. They have mines there with 30 million ounces still in the ground,and their PPs goes up with the PRICe of GOLD. Before I get BASHED for being a PUMPER kindly DD the heavies in the GOLDEN TRIANGLES of BC,CA. Why hang out here bashing me for giving some good relative information,as on topic was the speculative future value of "LBSR" after proveup. These are CANADIAN companies same as NAK,and have held HIGH PPs for years, and have never mined even ounces, are valued on their ORE CONTENT being PROVEN UP. What was said for clarity was if "LBSR" is proven up that our then VALUE PPs SHOULD be comparable to any of thes HIGH DOLLAR Golden Triangle mines. Unquestionably. IMO:ky