Replies to post #77 on Jennifer Convertibles, Inc. (fka JENNQ)

[sterlingkuning]

Important Dates
JENNQ - Jennifer Convertibles, Inc.

January 14th hearing:
SOURCE: https://ecf.nysb.uscourts.gov/doc1/126010212287 (from Scad's Post/DD)

01/11/2011 426 Statement Of The Official Committee Of Unsecured Creditors In Support Of Debtors' Motion Pursuant To 11 U.S.C. § 365 For Approval Of The Assumption Of Executory Contracts With Licensor, Effective As Of The Effective Date Of A Plan Of Reorganization (related document(s) 362 ) filed by James S. Carr on behalf of Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Jennifer Convertibles, Inc.. with hearing to be held on 1/14/2011 at 02:30 PM at Courtroom 617 (ALG) (Carr, James) (Entered: 01/11/2011)

January 25th hearing:
Source: 1/11/11 10-Q filed

"On November 19, 2010, we filed a plan of reorganization and accompanying disclosure statement with the Bankruptcy Court, which are subject to the Bankruptcy Court’s approval. On December 21, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court approved the disclosure statement and set a hearing date of January 25, 2011 for confirmation of the plan of reorganization, which is subject to the Bankruptcy Court’s approval."

Other timeline events
Source: from Scad's Post and Pacer

The original Plan for reorganization was filed on 11-19-10 DE # 339. That Plan included reference to the Assumption of Leases or Executory Contracts (Ashley)

On 12-3-10 JENNQ filed a Motion to Assume Leases or Executory Contracts DE # 362

On 12-17-10 JENNQ filed an Amended Plan DE # 384, 385, again referencing the Assumption...

On 12-22-10 Another Amended Plan DE # 399, 401, again, referencing the Assumption...

So, Ashley had THREE opportunities to see what the plan included and like I said, they included the Assumption AND they were aware of the Motion to Assume Leases...filed on 12-3.

Then, on 12-23-10, JENNQ filed another Motion to Assume Leases or Executory Contracts DE # 402 (not quite sure why they filed it again)

It wasn't until 1-4-11 that Ashley actually filed an objection and they objected to DE # 362, not the most recent one filed on 12-23 DE # 402