While I have no opinion one way or the other on the topic, I always find it interesting that when people find stories on the internet which support their story it becomes their whole basis for the future, but when they read a story that contradicts their means of thinking, they write the author off as a crackpot.
It is very similar to going to two doctors, one gives you terrible news so you seek out another opinion. The second doc tells you it was a fly on the X-ray and you go home happily whistling a tune.
Why do you suppose we do this?