InvestorsHub Logo

jimmenknee

12/31/10 1:07 AM

#86578 RE: Johnik #86521

Oh but the only way it works is through semantics because it can't be in the syntax:

I do recall him saying that if revenues were sufficient, the company would not do a PP, but I also recall him saying that he could not rule out the possibility of a future PP.



He said this while the PP was being executed. What are these statements called?

This one is not hard to answer-- really...

Otherwise-- if one does not define this as a lie (or the kinder gentler fib), then please help those of us that do see it as such with understanding some other key definitions.

Maybe all we need to do is agree on term meanings. Like we could build an investor slang dictionary which may ease some of the friction.

Your "in any event" closing travels down a whole different path filled with different slang/terms equally difficult to agree on...

let's just stick to now coming to an agreement that phrases given are so forward leaning that they wrap back around to become future potential truths in the face of a contradictory present. Sufficiently confusing to be plausible perhaps?