Replies to post #120767 on KAT Exploration Inc (KATX)

[rubber duck]

I'm all for objective discussion on both sides of the coin, but you saying there was nothing in hole 1 is inaccurate, to put it lightly.

[geo_newfie]

With all due respect and also not to try to sound like a pumper, but until KATX releases an official PR or publishes the results in a table on their website (per the last PR) this cannot be verified.

Obviously, if you or someone you truly trust has spoken directly to KATX with this information, then you can trust it. But for others it is not verified... yet.

I am not saying I believe there is something of value in this hole as the PR implied that there was not, but the PR also did not quote any assay numbers or even state they had any results for that matter.

[duelittle2]

So DCB or the real thing?

[Ron123456789]

9 properties. New claims. Agreement with Vale. Etc.

But maybe you're wright. That the funny thing about
pinkies... Coulbe nothing, but can also be GREAT!

[relikwie]

B402, you should have re-entered in the low .02's. The anticipated .015 by some is a long shot, unless final news definitely
confirm the drill test failed. Even then, I question what a fair market cap might be.