InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

snow

12/23/10 3:08 PM

#117507 RE: geo_newfie #117489

geo

In Olympic Dam the value was found on the outskirts if I remember correnctly. Could that be an explanation?
icon url

obukid

12/23/10 3:11 PM

#117518 RE: geo_newfie #117489

Ok let's discuss this even more then.
Maybe they thought the addition of claims would be a positive enough sign to limit the negative information in the PR?

..The investing public technically does not know we bought more land around RR yet. So that information is really only known buy a few.

We keep going back to the point that..... We are missing something, and we are not seeing everything in the light as of yet.


With only a fraction of the results back, I do not see based on what we got so far why katx should be down 35%.

Geo, wouldn't it make much more since to save the money and buy claims some where else if they knew the other results had the possibility of being just like what was PR'd today?

back to my point..... it just doesn't add up...somethings missing..
icon url

brooklynborn

12/23/10 3:29 PM

#117562 RE: geo_newfie #117489

geo -

try my posts #116746 & 116767

from last night - as to a possible explanation for the additional claim buys!

your opinion as to the possibility?