1.5, is my description of this suit accurate or am I missing something? I'm assuming Whit's counter suit charges were dismissed but NIR still has to prove their case to win. How do you prove it's o.k. to dump restricted shares and expect to be able to continue doing so? Didn't he violate terms of the finance agreement first? It's an open and shut case, imo. Unless I'm missing something. Am I? I think Judge Judy would throw CR out of her courtroom. Case dismissed. Next!