InvestorsHub Logo

XenaLives

12/21/10 1:30 PM

#204366 RE: extelecom #204363

I give you the opportunity part ... If Sarah can get nominated, ANYONE stands a chance. :)

makesumgravy

12/21/10 2:24 PM

#204370 RE: extelecom #204363

When governments impose income redistribution schemes to “spread the wealth,” workers and entrepreneurs loose their incentive to work as hard and have less to reinvest back into their communities. This is especially true in the case of charitable giving. Why should individuals make voluntary charitable contributions when the government has already invoked involuntary charity?

I wish I had more time to get into this, but there are a few tidbits that need to be looked at. It has nothing to do with which party gives a person more an opportunity to create wealth.
Both parties are corrupt, and became more an more corruptible over the last 4 decades. Individuals have become extremely wealthy, and poor under both. One party does do more to work with the American people, and the other works against the populace. Both have played major roles in selling this country down the river to both domestic, and foreign bodies. 17,500 lobbyist control more of what goes on in the government than all the voters combined. The politicians role is way outside what they are hired to do. One thing is certain, banks, hedgies, and corporations are pulling the reigns, and they have their bits in every congressmans mouth in DC.

The government now works against individuals of wealth whose real, and whose life work is charity by taking away the kind of tax incentives which further allows them to do this.