InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Gold Seeker

12/17/10 4:57 PM

#27744 RE: HALF FULL GLASS #27742


Half full stated: "Gold you finally told it like it is!"

Well Half, let me number those for you.

1. gold stated,"All of the other tests used to locate a possible cancer also have a huge number of false positives."

2. They also have huge false negatives !

3. Current cancer diagnostic tests absolutely suck!

Recaf is way ahead of the current tests !!!!


OK, half, now begin with the RECAF test. Where do you go then? That's right, go back to step one with the other tests with the huge number of false positives and negatives. What have you gained with RECAF?

RECAF is not going to fly half. Doctors are not going to use it. Wait and see what you get from the 1st quarter report in 2011. I bet you will still NOT see any REVENUE at all. Buger just fed investors the same line he fed them last year.
icon url

Gold Seeker

12/17/10 5:05 PM

#27745 RE: HALF FULL GLASS #27742

Half, when Burger said he was going to meet with Abbott in January, he was going to demonstrate the test with the synthetic peptide. First of all, is there really going to be a meeting? The one last year certainly did not happen.

Secondly, does the synthetic peptide make the test perform better?

Well, Burger has stated that they have been working with it for a year but could not disclose it until a patent application was filed. Do you think Moro has run RECAF tests using the synthetic peptide? Most certainly.

Did it perform better? Well, look at the press release for the synthetic peptide. What did Moro say was most important about the new peptide?

He said that it would extend the patent protection another 20 years. If it has improved the test, Moro would have been screaming to the high heavens that the test was improved. IMO, that would certainly be the most important aspect of the synthetic peptide.

Sometimes you learn more from what is NOT said than what is actually stated.