I guess it is what it is at this point but the mystery remains regarding the lack of a statement from CPV Holdings. If a fake doc with a CEO's signature on it hits the public domain it is always customary for the company to put out a statment denying the validity of the document.
Non-returned e-mails and statements that "we don't comment on rumors" is not the same as saying "no" the document is fake.
We will just have to wait and see what transpires over the next few weeks.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
