Replies to post #8057 on Matt_Chart - Favorite Technical Analysis Charts

[Matt_Chart]

Should The Gold/Silver Ratio be 3.3/1? Derivatives seem to think so.

Something’s Wrong in the Silver Pit, and It’s Much Bigger than J.P. Morgan
http://www.marketoracle.co.uk/Article24928.html


When researching the precious metals, often times things are seldom as they appear on the surface. GATA Secretary and Treasurer – Chris Powell – has said that the true picture of a nations’ gold holdings are, “more closely guarded than their nuclear secrets”.

This has been more-or-less proven true based on the Federal Reserve’s reaction to GATA’s 2009 FOIA request for information concerning GOLD SWAPS. The Fed is ON RECORD admitting they’ve done gold swaps – which, by definition, necessarily utilize sovereign American gold stocks.

To date, the Federal Reserve has stonewalled GATA’s FOIA request citing their ‘privileged status’ and reluctance to divulge ‘trade secrets’.

GATA has maintained that the Federal Reserve / U.S. Treasury in conjunction with other Central Banks have for years been suppressing the price of gold [and silver too] – in efforts to mitigate and to cover up their own debasement of fiat currencies.

Historically, when Central Banks or governments print more and more fiat money, precious metals prices RISE. The money printing is not only inflationary but when done to excess it can undermine confidence in faith based fiat currency regimes. Precious metal has no counterparty risk and cannot be printed – which is why it “is” and always will be money. Remember folks, gold is money, as evidenced by EVERY Central Bank in the world listing gold bullion on their balance sheet as an official reserve asset.

GATA has identified and documented that Central Banks utilize precious metals derivatives, and in particular swaps, as a primary method by with Central Banks rig metal prices.

In the presence of EXTREME money printing, it’s understandable why Central Banks and governments would want to suppress the price of gold [and silver] and be less than transparent about their nefarious activity in this regard. Knowledge and detail regarding these activities could undermine a nations’ currency, their credit rating and thus their ability to service their sovereign debt.

The following data set is taken from the June, 2010 Bank for International Settlements [BIS], Semiannual OTC Derivatives Report and it is compared to other data from the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s, June, 2010 Quarterly Report on Bank Derivatives Activities.

Relative comparison along with analysis within the data sets sheds new light on the scope of the precious metals price management scheme. Additional analysis is presented regarding the number and identities of other possible [or likely] players. It also illustrates how paper derivatives have become tools to determine/rig price instead of the intended and stated purpose of price discovery of the underlying physical asset.


source: http://www.bis.org/statistics/otcder/dt21c22a.pdf

Question: There are a total of 417 Billion notional in Gold derivatives outstanding – AND THE GOLD / SILVER Price RATIO is 49:1 – then WHY are outstanding notional silver derivatives 127 Billion???? These BIS numbers suggest that the proper gold / silver ratio should be roughly 3.3:1 or silver priced TODAY at 1,400 / 3.3 = 424.00 per ounce.

Now, let’s take a peek at what the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency tells us about “other precious metals” held by U.S. Commercial Banks:


source: U.S. OCC

OCC data tells us that J.P. Morgan and HSBC constitute 13.5 billion worth of the BIS’s reported total of 127 billion of derivatives in “other precious metals”. That’s about ONE TENTH of the total. WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER 90 % ??????

Note: Even if we compare the OCC totals for silver versus gold derivatives from the table above – OCC data is supportive of a “proper” gold / silver ratio of 131.6 / 13.6 = 9.7 This implies a silver price of 1,400 / 9.7 = 144.00 per ounce of silver.

Coincidentally, or perhaps not, COMEX open interest in gold futures is roughly 600K contracts @ 100 oz. per contract that is roughly 60 million oz of gold open interest. COMEX open interest in silver futures happens to be about 135k contracts @ 5,000 oz per contract which is roughly 650 million oz of silver open interest [note that silver open interest is not quite 11 times the open interest of gold]. So, again I ask, why is the gold / silver ratio at 48: 1?????

***For those who are not aware, silver naturally occurs in the earth’s crust approximately 7 – 10 times more frequently than gold.

Now, let’s take a look at ALL Derivatives of U.S. Commercial Banks as reported by the OCC:


source: U.S. OCC

Take note and remember that the breakout provided – above - by the OCC was for Commercial Banks ONLY.

Finally, let’s now look at the ONLY OCC data table depicting ALL Derivatives held by U.S. Bank Holding Companies:


source: U.S. OCC

Conclusions:

* The BIS tells us that total global outstanding “other precious metals” derivatives are 127 billion.
* General market wisdom [gleaned from OCC Commercial Bank data] suggest that J.P. Morgan and HSBC are the two dominant players in silver [other precious metals]
* Yet, the U.S. OCC tells us that J.P. Morgan and HSBC combined – make up 13.577 billion of the 127 billion BIS total [roughly 10 %].
* The U.S. OCC tells us that Morgan Stanley and B of A and Goldman have an additional combined 70 TRILLION in derivatives – at the Bank Holding Company level – but they give us NO HINT as to what portion of these totals consist of precious metals activity. We are left to assume that this is because the OCC is only mandated to regulate Commercial Banks – while Bank Holding Companies fall under the purview of the Federal Reserve.
* Unless J.P. Morgan and HSBC are LYING to regulators as to the extent of their silver market activity – there are other MASSIVE players in the silver price suppression game. Who ever these ‘players’ are – metaphorically, they MUST BE BLEEDING FROM EVERY ORIFICE with silver’s parabolic run up in price over the past few months.
* Most likely among American entities are MORGAN STANLEY, B of A and Goldman Sachs – since together they are operating a 70 Trillion derivative “BLACK BOX” about which we know LITTLE to NOTHING as it pertains to precious metals.
* Any way you slice it – precious metals data reporting on the part of American regulators is atrocious. Simple MATHEMATICS tells us a gold / silver ratio at 48:1 is EXTREMELY contrived and REEKS of manipulation on the part of the Federal Reserve and the Banks they are charged with regulating.

Got physical precious metal yet?

By Rob Kirby
http://www.kirbyanalytics.com/

Rob Kirby is proprietor of Kirbyanalytics.com and sales agent for Bullion Custodial Services. Subscribers to the Kirbyanalytics newsletter can look forward to a weekend publication analyzing many recent global geo-political events and more. Subscribe to Kirbyanalytics news letter here. Buy physical gold, silver or platinum bullion here.

Copyright © 2010 Rob Kirby - All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The above is a matter of opinion provided for general information purposes only and is not intended as investment advice. Information and analysis above are derived from sources and utilising methods believed to be reliable, but we cannot accept responsibility for any trading losses you may incur as a result of this analysis. Individuals should consult with their personal financial advisors before engaging in any trading activities.

[crudeoil24]

Should get a nice pop tomorrow....getting on a lot of radars.

YCKM recently announced an issuance of controlling interest of 52 million shares to Lin Xiangfeng, CEO of Shenzhen Eastern Mobile Communication Technology Co and the only reason that makes sense would be to take over the YCKM and vend in their business into this shell. And by the looks of today`s trading, this looks to be a monster move that not many people know about yet, but will soon find out next week.

YCKM closed at $0.24 up 336% and much higher than average volume of 1.6 million shares traded – we saw this as the beginning of a bullish run.

YCKM is a speculative play, but with big upside potential that may just be worth the inherent risk – investors are cautioned to do their own DD. Here are some DD and recent updates from YCKM to get you started:

Lin Xiangfeng, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Chairman of the Board of Directors Mr. Lin received his bachelor degree from Fuzhou University majoring in Business Administration and got his EMBA from Xiamen University. Mr. Lin founded Shenzhen Nan Kai Shi Ye Company Limited in April 2003. The company changed its name in 2008 and is currently known as Shenzhen Dong Sen Mobile Communication Technology Company Limited. Mr. Lin is currently serving as the Chairman of the company.

[2]http://www.implu.com/releases/2010/20101206/47784/implu_viewer 8K new Address and phone# for YCKM:

YELLOWCAKE MINING INC #1801 Building B, Hai Song Da Sha Che Gong Miao, Fu Tian Qu Shenzen, China 518041 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) 86 755 82718088 500-1000 Employee`s-Annual Exports $100 million per year, annual imports $50 million per year, annual turnover $500 million.

Announcement of Cancellation of Reverse Split – another bit of news that flew under the radar and creating more speculation of big things to come.

CANCELLATION OF REVERSE SPLIT December 1, 2010 Trading Symbol: OTCBB YCKM Yellowcake Mining Inc. (the “Company”) announces that further to its November 8, 2010 news release, the board of directors has decided not to proceed with a one for 3,700 reverse stock split of the Company`s authorized and issued and outstanding common stock. Therefore the share capital will not change at this time.



Read more: http://thestockmarketwatch.com/newsletters/2010/12/11/ourhotstockpicks-com-yckm-actc-a-speculative-play-to-thow-in-the-mix/#ixzz17wO86T40

[Matt_Chart]

SAEI Chart


10 Min MACD just gave a sell signal which suggests we are going to see more selling tomorrow.