Replies to post #36133 on One Step Ahead

[Downunder]

And what about those hundred bank accounts?

Janice you got proof of that?

[Bo14172]

JShell,

From my post:

If CMKX has the goods on the MM's, the iron is hot and the timing right. IMO

You typed:

"Why would you think CMKX "has the goods" on anyone?"

See the definition of the word 'if'.
Second, for months we witnessed no one being able to buy at .0001 until recently yet trades still went through. That's only one practice blatantly seen.

You typed:

If that were true, why didn't they do something about it a long time ago?

See the second part of my sentence. Explain your disclosure, financial ties and interests in wanting to see a company fail and lose money. Don't be a coward and say you have none and you simply do this because you're "interested in the story". That line is beyond old, and I'm waiting to see the day those who bash have the guts to simply say, "I and those I'm affiliated with short pinksheet stocks." There might be far more respect for what your opinion rather than coming across as having no life.

I know if I was shorting stocks legally, I'd have no problems saying so and give valid reasons for my concern on any stock, not the drivel bashers type 95% of the time. Now if you're shorting stocks ILLEGALLY, then you should continue to do exactly what you're doing.