MLM, communications from the company are important to me, which is why I discuss them. I really don't care about a private person's (i.e., someone outside the company) brochure, and I certainly do not care to read it if you say it is deceptive. This is not to suggest I support deception; I certainly do not. If I, personally, was deceived, then I would be far more vocal. I was not, because I have not read the brochure.
The fact that the brochure discusses JBI doesn't mean it was a JBI publication. Although it may contain information that was copied from one of the company's websites (as would appear from the last line in your post), that also does not make the brochure a JBI publication. Nobody from the company handed me a brochure at the AGM reflecting the earnings you posted, I have never seen such a brochure posted or linked on one of the company's websites, no one from the company has ever directed me to such brochure, etc. I don't know how you expect me to prove the absence of a link between such a brochure and the company other than to say that I have not found such a link. Why do you think it is that the plaintiff or prosecution ordinarily bears the burden of proof at trial (at least that's how it works where I am in the U.S.)?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
