Replies to post #32947 on Supatcha Resources Inc. (SAEI)

[crfield]

You didn't read that link.

CR

Here it is:

http://www.faqs.org/sec-filings/100714/Supatcha-Resources-Inc_10-K/

An excerpt from page 7

Mr. Laurence Sookochoff, P.Eng. was hired by Supatcha to provide an initial Geology Report dated December 12, 2007 on the Bonanza Claim. Mr. Sookochoff has been continuously practicing in his profession as a geologist since 1966, and has been involved in geological research, prospecting and exploration for metals. He graduated from the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, with a B.Sc. degree in Geology. He is a member of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia (No. 23572). Mr. Sookochoff is also president of Sookochoff Consultants Inc. He does not have any interest in the Bonanza Claim or the Company. Mr. Sookochoff has not visited the property. His report details the geological and exploration history of the Bonanza Claim, including the land status, climate, geology and mineralization. Based upon previous exploration activity in the area, Mr. Sookochoff recommends the Company conduct a specific exploration program on the Bonanza Claim. The purpose of this report was to evaluate the area of the claim group, and the prior exploration work conducted on the claims, and to recommend an exploration program. The recommendations contained in this report have been analyzed, validated and endorsed by our new Director and Chief Geological Advisor, Andrei B. Yasinskij.

There is the creditablity of Andrei B. Yasinskij.

[buccaneer1961]

some have exp. at both

[SpunjHamr]

SAEI.OB I think that what many people really want here, (not necessarily you) is a lower entry price. As long as Andrei Yasinskij is using proper chain of custody procedures as detailed in earlier PRs, uses an independent certified analytical lab, FDS Laboratory in Almaty, Kazakhstan, and actually sniffs out gold, I think he is adequately qualified to make the presentation of the NI 43-101.

People should reread the IBox with an eye to the sheer mass of detail that has gone into the DD and the company's activities. Questions about the permits, properties, work force, utilities, existing infrastructure, finds, sampling procedures, assays, filings, officers, and plans have mostly been addressed in the last couple of months.

The favorite nit to pick used to be the "E" and nobody seems to have forgiven it enough to not try to get cheaper prices regardless. We should steadily be above $.40 if any of the phony concerns over it had had any substance at all. There is no reason to expect that this latest persistent and wholly convenient burr under the saddle will make a bit of difference in the performance of the stock or the nature of doubters. Pink-minded traders will do what pink-minded traders do, cast doubts, wheedle for less, piss in their own drinking cups and moan about it.

I think that a lot of fear was generated the last couple of days for old hands to even be coddling the people who show up here trying to cast doubts this late in the game. Do some DD people or just take the time to read that which is provided so that you can lend some intelligence to the board. The suspicions and innuendos are tiresome and transparent. We are buying stock, we don't really run the company or even own it so quit expecting to preach to it's officers for a couple of dimes.