InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

SATELLITE

12/07/10 10:45 PM

#69300 RE: RDG013 #69299

I think your take on it is dead on, I for one will be watching it VERY closely.

CPRK(Q) is a risky investment, more than a normal Pink (the Q limits the amount of potintial investors) but *IF* they pull it out (with current investors intact) the reward could be .............. fill in blank.

It's fixen to get real fun. IMO

GLTA Longs
icon url

webtime

12/08/10 12:43 AM

#69301 RE: RDG013 #69299

I think people are 70-90% down already........... and when you are down that much you have nothing left to lose...........why would they sell at such tremendous loss?
The smart investors got out of this POS long ago and traded it for gains.........all others were left holding the bag...............and after that 30 day time period you mentioned.............they will still be holding the bag.
Trade it or lose it..............it's a pinkie........nothing more.
icon url

primarywatcher

12/08/10 9:00 AM

#69312 RE: RDG013 #69299

RDG makes a very good point here:

That being said, of course there is a chance things could go terribly wrong and the offers that are being readied could fall apart and shareholders end up with nothing. Well, anyone that is betting on things going this way, would probably want to sell now to preserve capital, rather than sell for the tax loss.



Now my intent here is to discuss this like adults, which includes reflecting upon the "negative" ALONG WITH the "positive".

Day in and day out this barely moves. Why now?
1. Sell off for tax purposes
2. Large stakeholders selling positions


From ESHC and CPRKSA:

A lot more information will become public record on the 14th making it easier for us to update everyone.




Admiration is the daughter of ignorance.
Benjamin Franklin