InvestorsHub Logo

frank69

12/02/10 3:19 PM

#193449 RE: Basser1 #193448

I agree that the finances of Eternal Image were not good when they worked out the loan with Emerald Assets.




They must be even worse now that's why they couldn't get a loan even with a sleezy lender like emerald.


But I don't see that there was any wrongdoing on the part of Eternal Image as they were not named in any type of suit. Some here are trying to push some guilty by association agenda but are not able to provide even the smallest amount of PROOF that Eternal Image has done anything even remotely wrong in this case.




of course you don't see a scam ( take off the rose colored glasses)

jason freeman (google him) was neck deep in a scam, the TA



emerald assets was also neck deep in a scam , the company borrowed 200k from them.



eternal image hasn't had enough sales to keep the doors open since it started and yet it is still in buisness.A stock selling scam.

(put the rose colored glasses back on)

nope no scam here.


ALL IMO


frank69

12/02/10 3:29 PM

#193451 RE: Basser1 #193448

Speaking of proof how is the search for the pump pr's that were said to have been put out by the company going??? Shouldn't have been that hard to find if they exist right???? I did notice that right after I asked for some proof of their existence that the dissucussion thread immediately changed, now why would that be???? HMMMMMM!





Where is the 8-k? The new license is not a material event?

Basicaly this is just a PR they can wiggle out of, it even even comes complete with a another pink sheet gimic the safe harbor clause.You know the one with all the ifs, buts, kindas, shoulda, coulda, wouldas in it.


So it amounts to a pump.


ALL IMO