InvestorsHub Logo

dmceng

03/14/05 3:20 PM

#22603 RE: frogdreaming #22602

frog
dutchess is in it for the return
we dont know the details because both parties in the transaction do not want

dmceng

03/14/05 3:22 PM

#22604 RE: frogdreaming #22602

frog
dutchess is in it for the return
we dont know the details because both parties in the transaction do not want us to know the details

Easyman51

03/14/05 7:40 PM

#22609 RE: frogdreaming #22602

bag8ger, perhaps consider this; who presently owns what % of the outstanding shares? How many shares are currently available? Perhaps not 50% left for controling interest. I have stated earlier I don't care too much for numbers unless they are part of defining parameters for patterns, then I'm all over em. :>)~~

I agree, that unless Richlips is leading w/ blinders on, and I don't, then he must believe that the direction of DnaPrint is an attainable possiblility.

I am more than hard on him and Moniker because I feel the frustrated sense of abandonment from Dr. Frudakis. Tomorrow we will atleast have the opportunity of getting something from Forensics and a legal analysis from Bary Scheck. Anyone getting a transcrip?

Easy