InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

littlefeets

12/01/10 12:18 AM

#153844 RE: ActivClient #153842

Great question ActivClient.

a. Share Buy Back Program

This has been CEO Lehner's stated goal. IMO

Thanks

icon url

wadirum1

12/01/10 12:36 AM

#153845 RE: ActivClient #153842

My answer is:

d) WNBD runs to 3c and I don't care about a, b, or c, because I loaded the boat with absurdly cheap shares that someone sold me thinking it was going to "trip 0s"
icon url

solarflux2

12/01/10 2:25 AM

#153854 RE: ActivClient #153842

No need for R/S split, IMO. The company can attain other means of funding other than dilution, as it is currently doing so as not to cause the pps to deteriorate. Reverse splits are only required when you need to dilute so much that the pps gets driven so low it has no chance to recover. No need to institute a reverse split when your pps can recover.

I think the CEO has stated there would be share buy backs more than he has talked about dividends, so my guess is share buy backs when and if the company becomes profitable.
icon url

Belgianshareholder

12/01/10 6:25 AM

#153864 RE: ActivClient #153842

A will happen first, B is in a few years and C will never happen IMO (otherwise Eric loses the trust of many longs).

JMO

icon url

Q-potential

12/01/10 7:00 AM

#153865 RE: ActivClient #153842

A (in 2 years), then B (>5 years), never C.
icon url

Belgianshareholder

12/01/10 7:07 AM

#153866 RE: ActivClient #153842

Maybe a survey can be posted...
icon url

nickl

12/01/10 7:47 AM

#153867 RE: ActivClient #153842

Eric's own words. shareholders.

The advantage to common shareholders of a share buy-back is that the funds invested by the firm in this manner have lingering benefit for the remaining shareholders, rather than the “one time” benefit of a dividend. No promise is being made that the firm will be in a position to do this. It is an illustration that if/when the company is successful to its plan, there is a mechanism favoured by management to diminish the outstanding share count in future to offset the earlier growth in the number of outstanding shares during the early stages of the company’s capitalization.

icon url

movinforward

12/01/10 8:03 AM

#153868 RE: ActivClient #153842

A. 3-5 years, will show strong faith by management
B. Never, don't really need to
C. Never, not a smart option
icon url

RyanTH

12/01/10 8:23 AM

#153870 RE: ActivClient #153842

A - in about 2-4 years. Sales will be significantly higher to support all expenses and reduce current business losses since startup. After profitability - then I believe Eric will start buying back shares to grow the value of the stock.
icon url

simbaba

12/01/10 9:29 AM

#153883 RE: ActivClient #153842

Honestly, i don't think A,B or C will ever happen.
I think the company gets bought out by a bigger company first.
icon url

doogdilinger

04/05/13 3:58 PM

#194966 RE: ActivClient #153842

Example number 10 when the Eric mantra was all about supposed share buybacks/no chance of a reverse split...check the 10 responses to this post:

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=57237079