Replies to post #220893 on NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[codes4real]

Fan-freakin-tastic

[cloud3]

This is not the way the patent process is supposed to work. This reeks of favors and vested interests misinforming those in position to make decisions. How else could they allow such *EXPENSIVE REDUNDANCY*? What value is there in the patents they award if anyone can continually have them reviewed to cast a pall over a fledgling company? The USPTO makes a mockery of itself and its charter. Call it what you want - corruption or undue influence but that's the name of the game here, folks.

There is no new art that was not already considered and reviewed.

[lesnshawn]

Thanx, krays. Unbelievable. lns eom

[phoenix69]

Another swell opportunity to strengthen NeoMedia patents.

[henke]

> ... that a reasonable examiner....

so...they claim that the previous examiners of USPTO were 'NOT REASONABLE' ???

[TradingCharts]

Thanks Krays. Two month extention from date received. Krays do you know that date?

[nicehit]

So now we have a re-exam of the re-exam... what a scam. The whole process starts again... dilution, OS back to the billions, R/S.

Maybe that's why LM jumped ship didn't want to go thru this again.