In re Snider Farms, Inc., 83 B.R. 977 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1988) (stating that, to be admissible: (1) a summary must be of the contents of the documents and not the testimony; and (2) “while projections of future lost profits are not legitimately admissible as summaries under [Rule 1006] since they are interpretations of past data and projections of future events, not simply a compilation of voluminous records they nevertheless may be admissible as opinion evidence under [Rules 701 and 702].”).