InvestorsHub Logo

emailjanum

11/27/10 6:54 PM

#24084 RE: emailjanum #24083

In re Snider Farms, Inc., 83 B.R. 977 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1988)
(stating that, to be admissible: (1) a summary must be of the
contents of the documents and not the testimony; and (2) “while
projections of future lost profits are not legitimately admissible as
summaries under [Rule 1006] since they are interpretations of past
data and projections of future events, not simply a compilation of
voluminous records they nevertheless may be admissible as
opinion evidence under [Rules 701 and 702].”).

http://www.abiworld.org/committees/newsletters/consumer/vol7num1/Lets_Litigate.pdf