Replies to post #24018 on AbitibiBowater, Inc. (fka ABWTQ)

[jimmyturbine]

general question, if indeed the commons are history(still not answered with confidence) then will this still be a publicly traded company and will they use the same ticker symbol?

Even asking those questions, who would invest in a company(any company) that does NOT value a common share holder? I wonder if there is a list for companies like this who have done this to folks then try to say we are a good company now so invest in us!?
Right, why would folks do that? Just thinking again but do hope for folks who did invest here get something.

imo and speculating while asking why we keep coming back to these companies,
jimmy

[emailjanum]

Shareholders are owner of the Company

Owner’s Testimony as to Value of Property.
1. Generally, an owner of property is competent to give an opinion of value
based upon substantial familiarity with the property. Shane v. Shane, 891
F.2d 976, 982 (1st Cir. 1989) “In testifying as to the value of his property,
an owner is entitled to the privileges of an expert.” Id.

[emailjanum]

Notwithstanding the advisory committee’s note on the addition of
subsection (c) to Rule 701, the advisory committee’s notes to Rule
702 regarding testimony by expert witnesses under Rule 702
states:
“Thus within the scope of [Rule 702] are not only experts
in the strictest sense of the word, e.g. physicians,
physicists, and architects, but also the large group
sometimes called “skilled” witnesses, such as bankers orlandowners testifying to land values.” [emphasis added]

http://www.abiworld.org/committees/newsletters/consumer/vol7num1/Lets_Litigate.pdf